Moderator: Cartographers
edbeard wrote:sorry this is a horrible idea.
if you don't like a map then you don't play it.
things are going fine here. It might be a bit slow but there's ups and downs in the foundry. I can honestly say that the foundry is always progressing.
laci_mae wrote:edbeard wrote:sorry this is a horrible idea.
if you don't like a map then you don't play it.
things are going fine here. It might be a bit slow but there's ups and downs in the foundry. I can honestly say that the foundry is always progressing.
Ed,
I think we might be soul mates.![]()
LMR
Also, It would also make it easier for the community to vote and give proper feedback on Maps if there are no more than 10 At A Time. And Give those creators a time limit Per Stage Of Progression. For Example. A week for Concise Idea And Draft... A Month For Second (Finished Looking) Draft For Feedback Of Graphics And Playablility... A month for 3rd Draft & Votes... A Month to Submit Finished Map Based On Feedback...Then Straight to XML - Playtesting - Etc. These Are Maximum time Limits - Of Course If There are circumstances...TUFF SHIT You Had A Bloody Month. If you Missed A Deadline Post A Request To Continue, If someone else wants to make the map Original Cartographer Must Be Sent A Message For The OK and Has A Month To Respond, If No Response Then They Let The Idea GO.
Keredrex wrote:No Offense to those that are truly Attempting to submit Good Work And Suggestions, and No Offense to the moderators Or this Fanatastic Site.....BUT....
I Think The Map Foundry Should Be Shut Down.... As in No NEW Ideas Or Posts.....Lock it off.
Those that are actively in development should be Judged and If Passed Continued. the Quality should be No less than Acceptable to The Majority of the voters AND ALL OF THE MODERATORS. When THose Maps get Quenched.... You Wipe The MAP Foundry... And Archive all the ideas that have ENOUGH Feedback in to their COMMON Posts (Periodic Table With All The Other Periodic Posts) And Keep them Locked......
I Feel This is needed To Improve Quality OVER ALL.... We Don't Need A Bunch Of thoughtless Maps From those that dont agree with Feedback and Want What They Want and Not whats best For The Game.
Also, It would also make it easier for the community to vote and give proper feedback on Maps if there are no more than 10 At A Time. And Give those creators a time limit Per Stage Of Progression. For Example. A week for Concise Idea And Draft... A Month For Second (Finished Looking) Draft For Feedback Of Graphics And Playablility... A month for 3rd Draft & Votes... A Month to Submit Finished Map Based On Feedback...Then Straight to XML - Playtesting - Etc. These Are Maximum time Limits - Of Course If There are circumstances...TUFF SHIT You Had A Bloody Month. If you Missed A Deadline Post A Request To Continue, If someone else wants to make the map Original Cartographer Must Be Sent A Message For The OK and Has A Month To Respond, If No Response Then They Let The Idea GO.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Keredrex wrote:These Are Maximum time Limits - Of Course If There are circumstances...TUFF SHIT You Had A Bloody Month. If you Missed A Deadline Post A Request To Continue, If someone else wants to make the map Original Cartographer Must Be Sent A Message For The OK and Has A Month To Respond, If No Response Then They Let The Idea GO.
i think he is onto something here.Keredrex wrote:I Think The Map Foundry Should Be Shut Down.... As in No NEW Ideas Or Posts.....Lock it off.
Those that are actively in development should be Judged and If Passed Continued. the Quality should be No less than Acceptable to The Majority of the voters AND ALL OF THE MODERATORS. When THose Maps get Quenched.... You Wipe The MAP Foundry... And Archive all the ideas that have ENOUGH Feedback in to their COMMON Posts (Periodic Table With All The Other Periodic Posts) And Keep them Locked......
how dare those map makers want what they want, lock those threads down. but not Keredrex's, obviously he knows what is best for the Game.Keredrex wrote:I Feel This is needed To Improve Quality OVER ALL.... We Don't Need A Bunch Of thoughtless Maps From those that dont agree with Feedback and Want What They Want and Not whats best For The Game.
so true, so true, 8 maps just wouldn't be enough to vote on and 11 is way to many. 10 is just right.Keredrex wrote:Also, It would also make it easier for the community to vote and give proper feedback on Maps if there are no more than 10 At A Time.
Kaplowitz wrote:and why do you capitalize random words? Its killing me!
DiM wrote:this thread is stupid and useless.
edbeard wrote:DiM wrote:this thread is stupid and useless.
whoa whoa whoa.
any thread where I find my soul mate is NOT useless.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
laci_mae wrote:Me! Me! Me!
![]()
LMR
mibi wrote:laci_mae wrote:Me! Me! Me!
![]()
LMR
get a room...
er...
usergroup.
Kaplowitz wrote:no.
and why do you capitalize random words? Its killing me!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users