Moderator: Community Team
halrob64 wrote:VOTE CHANAKAM
halrob64 wrote:Hurrah got there, the reason, Chan is a chancer in this game, I don't think he knows what to do without his AI buddy
chanakam2020 wrote:halrob64 wrote:VOTE CHANAKAM
Ok Halrob. Explain me why you decided to vote me immediatly after I asked explanation from Extreme Ways ,
Why he wanted to put you to L-1 in this reply ?
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=350#p5364472
Does your vote have to do some thing with I questioning Extreme Ways
Or ?
Do you have some other reason ?
![]()
![]()
Loose Canon wrote:I think extreme has made a decent potential mafia tell observation on kingm.
Following game avidly and kicking himself for unjoining, but needing to read or reread when following game avidly.
Could indeed be a mafia tell on kingm
SoN!c wrote:Very interesting these last 24 hours. And also now another 24 hours 'ish before deadline..
EW ghosted out the entire week (98 hours) D1 before deadline when he was scum with me. With good explanation in night chat. Now its 100% the opposite including a massive "EW-unlike" long post and being omni-present. I wonder if EW remembers his ghosting out strategy and doing the exact opposite for that reason.?
Then EW also backs down on his own good call on Kingm's post. I was thinking the exact same thing. But now it's "i don't really think that much of it". ??? Where is the pressure on Kingm (DDS) now?
Anyways, the only thing that seems sure is that newbie Chanakam and mastermind EW seem very much opposite alligned. So i'll poker along and vote Chanakam to see everybody"s pokerface and where to tie EW in on all this.
Remember: DDS voted Chanakam out of pure frustration and said he did not want to play anymore.. Mindblowing frustration levels..There must be a reason to lose control like that. Chanakam and DDS both scum is what i think. DDS getting supermad on his scumbuddy Chanakam when he posted that AI thing?
Because DDS was n°3 on the sus list with Max the top target. I can see a newbie Chanakam posting that list with his scumbud on place 3. He (Chanakam) voted Max when posting that list. Max was the target, not DDS.. Nobody would really look at third place on some stupid AI list except Loose because Loose has a special place in his hearth for Max. Something Chanakam would not know. The list triggered loose his voting on DDS and DDS flipped knowing Loose on your back is very hard to shake off. And all thanks to his own scumbuddy on D1
SoN!c wrote:Welcome Kingm !
Very happy Kingm is here xD
But also a bit dissapointed in DDS
Extreme Ways wrote:Kingm wrote:Charle wrote:Kingm replaced DDS.
The vote from DDS against Chana still stands until King decides to change the vote.
Welcome King, enjoy the game and thanks for standing in!
Have fun!!
My pleasure, I was kicking myself for withdrawing, so I'm happy to playing now.
I have been eagerly following the game, but just as a neutral spectator, now I probably have to read it all again.
For now Unvote Chana, have to make up my own mind first.
Why do you have to read it again?
Does your rolecard tell you you need to push out townies?
Extreme Ways wrote:As for my own solving:
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=350#p5364365
I push Kingm on a stupid technicality because the wording of this pings me the hell of. Either he has been eagerly following and has an idea about the game, or he hasn't. Re-reading implies that after receiving his rolecard he now has a new pov. And to some extent that's true, as he now knows DDS' role. But the way it is presented reads more like "now that I know I'm scum, I need to re-read what everyone said to see what I can push"
I think you can call my whole pushing you as solving. I'm trying to figure out your alignment.
While the premise of this post is outdated: viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=350#p5364293
I call out Sonic for unvoting someone for what I thought was poor arguments, not realising he had already voted someone else. The thought being that I didn't understand why he would unvote you all of a sudden when the priors of his vote on you hadn't changed.
In general, you can see me pushing some buttons and back off/push more depending on responses.
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=275#p5364058
I ask you to explain your vote, and this post ultimately leads to me voting you. I am asking questions, and doing things with the answers I get. You vote Sonic for going to Kreta. I vote you because the reasoning has no meat.
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=250#p5363882
This whole interaction with Sonic you can try to analyse too. It's consistent in that I was once again wondering from what place a vote came from (feeling like just following me), except this time I accepted the explanation as probably town.
---------------
Yes, I make general posts about mafia theory too. No, I do not count those as solving. What I like to see is people taking stances on people whether right or wrong, and figure out of there's some internal logic that lead to that stance. Whether some logic is lacking. Whether that implies they should be doing something else.
For example: Sonic/Ragian are (to the best of my memory) currently not townreading each other. I am townreading Ragian, and to a certain extent townreading Sonic. Based on this, do you expect me to address them both and see if I can help them find each other as town? I'm not doing that because I am not confident enough in my townreads, and because some of the points they have mentioned make sense.
I'm also reluctantly townreading hjelp just based on energy and vibes, and townreading Loose. I am forced to townread halrob, and think his claim is true.
I am not townreading you so when a light townread of mine, Sonic, backs off, I do question it. Even if I missed the part in between where Sonic voted DDS.
Now, can you do the same for your reads on some players?
Loose Canon wrote:I think extreme has made a decent potential mafia tell observation on kingm.
Following game avidly and kicking himself for unjoining, but needing to read or reread when following game avidly.
Could indeed be a mafia tell on kingm
Ragian wrote:If so, it's interesting that he unvotes Chana.
Extreme Ways wrote:Loose Canon wrote:I think extreme has made a decent potential mafia tell observation on kingm.
Following game avidly and kicking himself for unjoining, but needing to read or reread when following game avidly.
Could indeed be a mafia tell on kingm
I think you put more weight to it then I do, but I will leave kingm to confirm it.
Extreme Ways wrote:chanakam2020 wrote:halrob64 wrote:VOTE CHANAKAM
Ok Halrob. Explain me why you decided to vote me immediatly after I asked explanation from Extreme Ways ,
Why he wanted to put you to L-1 in this reply ?
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=350#p5364472
Does your vote have to do some thing with I questioning Extreme Ways
Or ?
Do you have some other reason ?
![]()
![]()
Any reason why you choose to reply to this post, but not to my post (also: I never advocated halrob to be put to L-1 and I didnt vote myself precisely for that reason)?
chanakam2020 wrote:@Extreme Ways
Now this is becoming interesting and worthy analyzeExtreme Ways wrote:chanakam2020 wrote:Extreme Ways wrote:Your hesitancy on bringing Halrob to L-1 is indeed a post worthy of some alignment.
How can I put Halrob to L-1 . Because when Halrob was put to L-2 & when he made claim my vote is already in that 5 votes there and
I cannot vote twice. And Explain me why you expected to put some one claimed town power role to L-1 after he claimed power role & there was no counter claim. Now this is very suspecious to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
That's how you decide to read my post. I said that you preferring others not to put him in hammer range (=execution range) is indeed something which helps in telling your alignment. I didn't say it makes you scummy, or towny for that matter.Extreme Ways wrote:Your hesitancy on bringing Halrob to L-1 is indeed a post worthy of some alignment.
You did not answer my most important question here.
Why Did you wanted to keep my vote to Halrob without Unvoting him and put Halrob in L-1 even after he claimed that he is town and holding a power role for town.
He made his claim when he was in L-2.
This is the vote count when Halrob is in L-2 .Charle wrote:Vote Count:
Halrob (5) - Loose, Sonic, Darin, Chanakam, Max
Loose (1) - hjelp
Darin (1) - Kong
hjelp (1) - Devon
13 Alive - 7 Needed for a Lynch
You have not voted at that point. Still you was expecting someone else to put Halrob to L-1
And you are not casting that 6th Vote putting Halrob to L-1.
So why you wanted to some one else put him to L-1 instead doing it by yourself even ahfte he claim powr role at L-2?
You waited If some one put him to L-1 then To cast 7th Vote and nail the coffin ?
Or
if players did not put Halrob to L-1 then stay away from voting him and act innocient ?
Explain.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Extreme Ways wrote:(also: I never advocated halrob to be put to L-1 and I didnt vote myself precisely for that reason)?
Extreme Ways wrote:chanakam2020 wrote:Extreme Ways wrote:Your hesitancy on bringing Halrob to L-1 is indeed a post worthy of some alignment.
How can I put Halrob to L-1 . Because when Halrob was put to L-2 & when he made claim my vote is already in that 5 votes there and
I cannot vote twice. And Explain me why you expected to put some one claimed town power role to L-1 after he claimed power role & there was no counter claim. Now this is very suspecious to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
That's how you decide to read my post. I said that you preferring others not to put him in hammer range (=execution range) is indeed something which helps in telling your alignment. I didn't say it makes you scummy, or towny for that matter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users