Gypsys Kiss wrote:Dexsting wrote:You shouldn't need the fielder, just the batter and a four to score. You want to -not- control fielders if you're going offensive...
Thats a good point. If you own the batsman and the fielder, you wont be scoring any runs. It might even be worth a -1 if you hold batsman, fielder and four and +1 if you hold just the batsmen and the four. It might be difficult to impliment that considering the number of fours and fielders.
i can understand what you mean, but that might create gameplay problems, because the incentive to go for the bonus for having all fielders might not be enough to attack fielders. we don't want a situation whereby no one wants to attack fielders. also, there is already a -1 for batsman & fielder, so to get the batsman & four bonus you would need to conquer four and hope that someone conquers fielder from you.
i think it's a bit like having all the shots come from one batsman; it might be more realistic that way, but sometimes in order to facilitate easier gameplay we have to make sacrifices. am loving this map so far, and the discussion with it. keep up the good work cairnswk