Leitz wrote:Unvote, vote dazza2008 for being so silent!
Vote Leitz for voting me for bing silent. I was busy getting drunk and stuff. A drunken Scotsman post would not help anyone here

Moderator: Community Team
Leitz wrote:Unvote, vote dazza2008 for being so silent!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Rodion wrote:I'll try to go ahead and get the ball rolling. I want to ask everyone a question. Consider the following list.
Players
1. Leitz
2. MoB Deadly
3. Rodion
4. jimfinn
5. shieldgenerator7
6. jonty125
7. dazza2008
8. trinicardinal
9. Swifte
10. drunkmonkey
11. BGtheBrain
12. Epitaph1
13. betiko
14. MeDeFe
15. chapcrap
16. strike wolf
1 - "Are you ok if we lynch the person that is right below you?" (for Strike Wolf, consider the first person on the list)
2 - "Why?"
Rodion wrote:I'll try to go ahead and get the ball rolling. I want to ask everyone a question. Consider the following list.
Players
1. Leitz
2. MoB Deadly
3. Rodion
4. jimfinn
5. shieldgenerator7
6. jonty125
7. dazza2008
8. trinicardinal
9. Swifte
10. drunkmonkey
11. BGtheBrain
12. Epitaph1
13. betiko
14. MeDeFe
15. chapcrap
16. strike wolf
1 - "Are you ok if we lynch the person that is right below you?" (for Strike Wolf, consider the first person on the list)
2 - "Why?"
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
dazza2008 wrote:I agree with everyone else. It would be completely random. I have not seen anything scummy from him yet.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
strike wolf wrote:Of course if I had ever lernt how to read than I would have known that wasn't post 100...
betiko wrote:strike wolf wrote:Of course if I had ever lernt how to read than I would have known that wasn't post 100...
lol, you tried hard for it, and you made it!!![]()
unvote, vote strike wolf!!![]()
about the question, no cause i like very scientific methods, like posting the number 100 post. voting for the guy below me is too random. anyway, if we all vote for the guy below us i m not sure we would go very far!!
I suggest we all vote for the guy who s name is below the same person, I also suggest that this person we choose to lynch is scum.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:dazza2008 wrote:I agree with everyone else. It would be completely random. I have not seen anything scummy from him yet.
Have you seen anything at all from him?
dazza2008 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:dazza2008 wrote:I agree with everyone else. It would be completely random. I have not seen anything scummy from him yet.
Have you seen anything at all from him?
Not a lot but he has posted. Twice since he confirmed. Just a joke vote and answered Rodion.
jonty125 wrote:1. I would be willing lynch dazza
2. Why because Stoke aren't doing amazingly well in my tournie and guess who's resprenting stoke
unvote vote dazza
EBWOP Got excited with the 0's
dazza2008 wrote:jonty125 wrote:1. I would be willing lynch dazza
2. Why because Stoke aren't doing amazingly well in my tournie and guess who's resprenting stoke
unvote vote dazza
EBWOP Got excited with the 0's
Really? I am 11th in the tourney and Stoke are 12th in real life.
jimfinn wrote: unvote, Vote: Rodion
The random question of whether we should lynch the person below us seems a bit scummy to me. After all, it seems readily apparent that mafia would want a random lynch and town would not, but the obviousness of that also means that mafia would also want to act like they did not want the lynch. This can lead only to WIFOM and eating up valuable time, and feels deliberately nonhelpful of him to do. He's trying to keep us from getting out of the RVS/RQS
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
jonty125 wrote:dazza2008 wrote:jonty125 wrote:1. I would be willing lynch dazza
2. Why because Stoke aren't doing amazingly well in my tournie and guess who's resprenting stoke
unvote vote dazza
EBWOP Got excited with the 0's
Really? I am 11th in the tourney and Stoke are 12th in real life.
You just got beaten 6-0 by Bolton (slightly worse than Stoke)
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
dazza2008 wrote:jonty125 wrote:dazza2008 wrote:jonty125 wrote:1. I would be willing lynch dazza
2. Why because Stoke aren't doing amazingly well in my tournie and guess who's resprenting stoke
unvote vote dazza
EBWOP Got excited with the 0's
Really? I am 11th in the tourney and Stoke are 12th in real life.
You just got beaten 6-0 by Bolton (slightly worse than Stoke)
True it was poorunvote vote dazza
Users browsing this forum: No registered users