Puss In Boots C9 Mafia, Mafia Wins, Safari + Ghost

[ghostly447]

yes, but this is a small game, i expect that there may be a roleblocker, but that isnt a complete killer, since he can only select one person to block a night, if there even is one. i appoligize for the innactivity. im not into day one, but i try to add where i can.

given that our mod posted this bit on the first page I'd say there would be no roleblocker

Puss in Boots Mafia


This mafia set-up will be a C9 game. i would at least 2 new/inexperienced players to join. 5 spots will be open for anyone and at least 2 spots designated to newbs. Asking questions about mafia is highly recommended in this game, any questions about your role etc that would help give the game away must be pm'ed to me directly.

Possible set-ups:
2 Mafia, 5 VTs
2 Mafia, 1 cop, 4 VTs
2 Mafia, 1 doc, 4 VTs
2 Mafia, 1 cop, 1 doc, 3 VTs

anyway something else has just caught my attention

How do I obviously like my case too much? Are you kidding me, that is no case!

Vote CLEVER for trying to bandwagon with a weak case on what was already a weak case.

You're at L-1 ghostly, better claim.

Vote safariguy for obviously skimming - ghostly claimed earlier on and 2 people have even unvoted as a result

posted by trini on page 5 at the bottom. safariguy might want him dead after this, although it is a weak case it is something to go off of at least for now... now i will try to find more evidence that would make it a better case.

you even said yourself it is a weak case. Now you are claiming that it is as strong as CLEVER constantly trying to argue a weak case agaisnt me? You reversed your logic on yourself.

[new guy1]

i do not believe that your claim holds any weight. i would call for a mass claim if i didnt fear revealing town power roles, but it seems we must continue making weak cases against each other with what we already know. i still believe that ghostly and safari are working together and have been this whole time. im getting off for now, but i shall be back, hopefully to better cases then the ones presented, even if it is against me.

[ghostly447]

i do not believe that your claim holds any weight. i would call for a mass claim if i didnt fear revealing town power roles, but it seems we must continue making weak cases against each other with what we already know. i still believe that ghostly and safari are working together and have been this whole time. im getting off for now, but i shall be back, hopefully to better cases then the ones presented, even if it is against me.

A better case already did present itself. The fact you and CLEVER are already going against me with a terrible case, not even voting against me yet. You 2 work together more than me and ANYONE in this game.

So for that, my vote stays on CLEVER, and when he claims, I will go from there. But for now, you and him arguing against me, when clearly the CLEVER case is stronger than the safari case, is enough for me to want to force him to claim.

[codierose]

what other cases are there weak or not its a case

[ghostly447]

what other cases are there weak or not its a case

I think you got fastposted a dozen times. Which case are you against and for?

[codierose]

fast posted ghost
good points ghost
safari has already answered you new guy to your fos and provided valid points powers claiming at this point is not going to get us anywhere unless they have leads

[codierose]

first case lets get this going
2. I need to go remember why I lied. I believe I informed you (covering 3 as well) that I was on my phone, so I didnt get to see whatever it was.

2 is a bs reason. 4 is a bs reason. 5 is a bs reason.

weak case in my mind.

CLEVER, you have obviously Skimmed, shown inactivity, and attempted to bandwagon on a weak case with a weak case. Therefore, my vote stands whether I am to be lynched or not.[/quote]

wow that is actually a good case...hmmm
well then you might wanna claim so you dont get lynched[/quote]


So, I do not recall actually getting to the bottom of this terrible case. Since Day 2 is going as slow as molasses in January, I will go ahead and bring this back up. CLEVER, mind explaining yourself as to why you brought up this terrible, already disproven case, against me Day 1? All I saw in your case was "Bandwagon Bandwagon Bandwagon" after your inactivity (or I would prefer to call it, scumarining) and your skimming (obvious because you had not quite read that I had already gone through and answered the case point by point, and did not feel it was a strong case).
sorry this looks wierd but i had to many quotes in there

Fast posted by CLEVER[/quote]


well you missed the messages in between in between you had stated that i was band wagoning and made a case on me therefore i said

wow that is actually a good case...hmmm
well then you might wanna claim so you dont get lynched

[/quote]
when i said this i meant the case against me was good not that the case against you was good
so i think that was a misunderstanding[/quote]
can anyone explain whats this is all about i know i just woke up but hell

[ghostly447]

first case lets get this going
2. I need to go remember why I lied. I believe I informed you (covering 3 as well) that I was on my phone, so I didnt get to see whatever it was.

2 is a bs reason. 4 is a bs reason. 5 is a bs reason.

weak case in my mind.

CLEVER, you have obviously Skimmed, shown inactivity, and attempted to bandwagon on a weak case with a weak case. Therefore, my vote stands whether I am to be lynched or not.

wow that is actually a good case...hmmm
well then you might wanna claim so you dont get lynched[/quote]


So, I do not recall actually getting to the bottom of this terrible case. Since Day 2 is going as slow as molasses in January, I will go ahead and bring this back up. CLEVER, mind explaining yourself as to why you brought up this terrible, already disproven case, against me Day 1? All I saw in your case was "Bandwagon Bandwagon Bandwagon" after your inactivity (or I would prefer to call it, scumarining) and your skimming (obvious because you had not quite read that I had already gone through and answered the case point by point, and did not feel it was a strong case).
sorry this looks wierd but i had to many quotes in there

Fast posted by CLEVER[/quote]


well you missed the messages in between in between you had stated that i was band wagoning and made a case on me therefore i said

wow that is actually a good case...hmmm
well then you might wanna claim so you dont get lynched

[/quote]
when i said this i meant the case against me was good not that the case against you was good
so i think that was a misunderstanding[/quote]
can anyone explain whats this is all about i know i just woke up but hell [/quote]

Well, I brought up the Day 1 case that CLEVER attempted to bandwagon with against me (the weak one that I disproved and then was forgotten after I claimed) and he for some reason thinks I thought the one against me was good, but actually I knew he was saying the one against him was good. Little confusing, I know, but I think its on page, like, 7 or something like that.

[codierose]

@ ghost claims never forgotten
clever just seems all over the place hes on l2 time to defend yourself clever

[safariguy5]

Yeah I agree, I think clever and new guy are working together more than ghostly and I are. ghostly brings up a case on clever and new guy immediately tries to deflect suspicion by rehashing an old case on me.

FOS New guy1

[Some7hingCLEVER]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

[codierose]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

cant see the terror as a vt lol i wish i could vote for you again

[dazza2008]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

cant see the terror as a vt lol i wish i could vote for you again

Why not?

Who is likely to be the 2 mafia in this?

[codierose]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

cant see the terror as a vt lol i wish i could vote for you again

Why not?

Who is likely to be the 2 mafia in this?

because of the character description from the movie

[dazza2008]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

cant see the terror as a vt lol i wish i could vote for you again

Why not?

Who is likely to be the 2 mafia in this?

because of the character description from the movie

I just read up. I have not seen it. I ask who is likely to be mafia. I was unsure from what I read.

[codierose]

I guess im at l2 so I have to claim
The terror vanilla townie

cant see the terror as a vt lol i wish i could vote for you again

Why not?

Who is likely to be the 2 mafia in this?

because of the character description from the movie

I just read up. I have not seen it. I ask who is likely to be mafia. I was unsure from what I read.

yea me 2 i just read what it said on wiki just cant see the terror as being a town i need to read up on it a bit more has anyone seen the movie

[ghostly447]

Over the next seven years, Puss became a swashbuckling hero but wanted by the law, as he searched for a way to clear his name and repay the stolen money, when he found himself at a bar where he heard of two murderous outlaws, Jack & Jill, in possession of the magic beans he had long sought.

Got this via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puss_in_Boots_(Shrek)#Puss_in_Boots (use the ctrl f tool and enter this in).

I think we have our mafia names. But Dazza, why do you even need to know? I personally do not feel that the mafia would use their real names, for fear someone would dig it up and examine it anyways. No mafia that I have ever seen would ever use their real claims. Thats why a fake claim is provided.

[Some7hingCLEVER]

I have never seen the movie I just know thats what it says in my pm soooo

[new guy1]

Yeah I agree, I think clever and new guy are working together more than ghostly and I are. ghostly brings up a case on clever and new guy immediately tries to deflect suspicion by rehashing an old case on me.

FOS New guy1

alright, lemme just say. i rehashed the case on you because ghostly rehashed one from day one on CLEVER. in my games, i try to find players that have believable claims and so agree with them. i do not at all believe new guy could be town because he went for a case all the say back from day one when there was one just a page back that he barely commented on.
fastposted X2

ghostly447, how the hell do you know fakeclaims are provided in this game???

[new guy1]

Yeah I agree, I think clever and new guy are working together more than ghostly and I are. ghostly brings up a case on clever and new guy immediately tries to deflect suspicion by rehashing an old case on me.

FOS New guy1

alright, lemme just say. i rehashed the case on you because ghostly rehashed one from day one on CLEVER. in my games, i try to find players that have believable claims and so agree with them. i do not at all believe ghostly could be town because he went for a case all the say back from day one when there was one just a page back that he barely commented on.
fastposted X2

ghostly447, how the hell do you know fakeclaims are provided in this game???

EBWOP again >.<...

[ghostly447]

Yeah I agree, I think clever and new guy are working together more than ghostly and I are. ghostly brings up a case on clever and new guy immediately tries to deflect suspicion by rehashing an old case on me.

FOS New guy1

alright, lemme just say. i rehashed the case on you because ghostly rehashed one from day one on CLEVER. in my games, i try to find players that have believable claims and so agree with them. i do not at all believe new guy could be town because he went for a case all the say back from day one when there was one just a page back that he barely commented on.
fastposted X2

ghostly447, how the hell do you know fakeclaims are provided in this game???

They have been in all my other games. At least the ones I have played as mafia in. Are they not always provided? fast posted.

[dazza2008]

Over the next seven years, Puss became a swashbuckling hero but wanted by the law, as he searched for a way to clear his name and repay the stolen money, when he found himself at a bar where he heard of two murderous outlaws, Jack & Jill, in possession of the magic beans he had long sought.

Got this via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puss_in_Boots_(Shrek)#Puss_in_Boots (use the ctrl f tool and enter this in).

I think we have our mafia names. But Dazza, why do you even need to know? I personally do not feel that the mafia would use their real names, for fear someone would dig it up and examine it anyways. No mafia that I have ever seen would ever use their real claims. Thats why a fake claim is provided.

The only reason I asked is because I wondered why codie thought he would claim a scummy character. Like you say though whatever it is they will not claim that so he still could be scum.

[ghostly447]

It is really a luck of the draw here. Look for scum slips, or lynch the best case. cant really go off of claims normally. some are weak, some arent.

Codie, please tell me where you found "The Terror" because I cant find one in plot.

[codierose]

It is really a luck of the draw here. Look for scum slips, or lynch the best case. cant really go off of claims normally. some are weak, some arent.

Codie, please tell me where you found "The Terror" because I cant find one in plot.

already did wiki
im not saying hes not the terror is what role he was given its what he claimed VT

a fearsome monster called the Terror

does this sound like a town to you
just cant see the terror as VT

[dazza2008]

It is really a luck of the draw here. Look for scum slips, or lynch the best case. cant really go off of claims normally. some are weak, some arent.

Codie, please tell me where you found "The Terror" because I cant find one in plot.

already did wiki
im not saying hes not the terror is what role he was given its what he claimed VT

a fearsome monster called the Terror

does this sound like a town to you
just cant see the terror as VT

I looked here and "the terror" is the golden goose's mother. Is that all that scummy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puss_in_Bo ... 11_film%29