Epstein Client List

[Pack Rat]

Epstein's birthday book!




The Epstein Files will be released soon.

[jusplay4fun]

I see no there there.

And that is TRUE no matter how many silly videos the parrot rat posts.

Give it up, pee rat. No one is looking at your incessant posting of meaningless videos. They are like crazy, silly, and repetitious rants by a drunken fool. And how many of your posts have I ignored in recent days? I know you are salivating as you LOOK for another video to post in response.

[Pack Rat]

I guess I'm hitting a nerve, heh. Your personal attacks is proof of that.

[jusplay4fun]

pee rat, you are COMPELLED to reply in just over two hours. Admit it, I made YOUR day. What a LOSER.

Hit a nerve? because you post more drivel? Hardly. You obviously give yourself FAR TOO much credit and influence. I proved that you influence NO ONE here on CC. DOUBLE Loser.

And there is no there there.

[Pack Rat]

I definitely hit a nerve, lol!

[Pack Rat]

Now back on the subject:

[jusplay4fun]

Alex Acosta, former US attorney who negotiated Epstein's plea deal, appears before House Oversight Committee

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/alex-acosta-former-us-attorney-negotiated-epsteins-plea/story?id=125731737

and

Melania Trump's team has aggressively knocked down Epstein-related 'falsehoods'
The normally reserved first lady is upset by what her team calls ‘defamatory’ Epstein rumors, and her office has taken a direct approach in pushing back, earning retractions. (...)

The Daily Beast retracted a story headlined “Melania Trump ‘Very Involved’ in Epstein Scandal: Author,” based on an interview with Michael Wolff, who claimed that Epstein was involved in introducing her to Trump. (...)

A spokesman for the first lady, Nick Clemens, told NBC News in a statement: “First Lady Melania Trump’s attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, ‘Melania.’”

In the book, Melania Trump said she first met her husband at a party at the Kit Kat Club in September 1998 in New York City and that they were introduced by someone else, not Epstein.

These were just the latest in a series of retractions related to the first lady and the Epstein saga. References to Melania Trump were also removed from a new book about Britain’s Prince Andrew, released last month. It’s unclear whether the publisher received any kind of legal notice from the first lady’s attorneys or whether it decided to pull the material on its own.

I think the parrot pee rat helped spread lies about Melania.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=242772&p=5362881&view=show#p5362881

[Pack Rat]

Release the Epstein Files!

show

[jusplay4fun]

[size=150]Release the Epstein Files!

[size=200]STOP PROTECTING CHILD PREDATORS![/spoiler]

Do you mean Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew? Must be.

The place was starting to SMELL better, until the rat moved back in. SAD.

You are about as PATHETIC as Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert; you all have only ONE POOR attempt at humor and no one is buying it (well, if 300,000 viewers is worth all the money paid to them). NO wonder two large outlet refuse to carry Kimmel. Kimmel's skill as a comedian is nearly as bad as pee rat's skills as a debater blogger.

Now pee rat is SO HAPPY that he will now post at least 15 more silly and worthless videos that NO ONE watches. Get a Grip, pee rat; your vision of reality is simply WRONG, and no one here is buying your TRASH.

[Pack Rat]

See how this pedo protector tries to wave Clinton's name for a whataboutthis bull shit!

Unlike your support of a cover up of obvious sexual crimes to children. I want all these monsters brought to justice, regardless of wealth, party affiliation and even British royalty.

There needs to be stronger regulations and enforcement of laws to protect children from adults who prey on the innocence of children, especially day care centers, schools (public, private and religious).

There's something creepy about someone who is involved with children who supports the cover up the sexual crimes against children.

[Pack Rat]

Oh my...Epstein made videos.

[jusplay4fun]

As I said several times already, there is NO THERE THERE:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c2dr3z9egljt

The three emails released by House Democrats

As we've been reporting, Democrats on the US House Oversight Committee have released correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein, and associate Ghislaine Maxwell and author Michael Wolff.

Here are the emails which have been released:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c2dr3z9egljt

AND THIS is the Dems BEST SHOT? Conclusion: There is NO THERE THERE.

And one of the Main accusers of Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, who committed suicide, said Trump treated her well AND DID NOT HAVE SEX with her.

Virginia Giuffre, the most prominent victim of late convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, took her own life Thursday — just weeks after she made headlines for saying she had “four days to live” following a collision with a bus.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/25/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-dies-by-suicide-weeks-after-saying-she-had-days-to-live/

and:

Executive Summary

Virginia Giuffre’s sworn deposition in 2016 and later public accounts consistently deny that Donald Trump sexually assaulted or had sex with her, while confirming she worked at Mar‑a‑Lago and met Trump there; her posthumous memoir and reporting add context but do not allege criminal conduct by Trump. Media coverage and statements from Trump and his defenders have emphasized different narratives—Trump saying Epstein “stole” workers from Mar‑a‑Lago, Giuffre’s family expressing shock, and Giuffre’s own accounts stressing encounters but not implicating Trump in Epstein’s trafficking ring [1] [2] [3].

1. What Giuffre actually said under oath — the clear denial that reshaped the record

Virginia Giuffre’s deposition testimony has been repeatedly cited for one clear, consequential statement: she denied that Donald Trump flirted with her, had sex with her, or was involved in sexual encounters with any girls who were in Epstein’s network during the time she knew Epstein. That categorical denial is central to the factual record and was reported in coverage of her 2016 deposition released publicly years later [1]. The testimony also confirmed more prosaic facts: she worked as a locker‑room or spa attendant at Mar‑a‑Lago around 2000 and met Trump there on multiple occasions. Those work and meeting details are corroborated across her memoir and reporting but, importantly, the deposition separates attendance and acquaintance from any allegation of wrongdoing by Trump [4] [1].

2. How Giuffre’s later memoir and public remarks added texture without changing the core denial

Giuffre’s posthumous memoir and interviews elaborate on her early life, her work at Mar‑a‑Lago, and encounters with high‑profile figures including Trump, Prince Andrew, and Ghislaine Maxwell; the memoir does not accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, instead depicting him as part of the social backdrop at Mar‑a‑Lago in 2000 [4]. Media summaries and her ghostwriter’s comments paint Giuffre as having viewed Trump as kind in some encounters and, at times, politically supportive because he discussed releasing Epstein files—yet none of those accounts alter the deposition’s denial of sexual contact with Trump. The memoir and publicity thus provide personal detail and context while leaving the deposition’s substance intact [3] [4].

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/virginia-giuffre-epstein-deposition-donald-trump-statements-157c5e

and
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/virginia-giuffre-jeffrey-epstein-accuser-claims-reporter-embellished-many-donald-trump-connections/

"I didn't physically see [Trump] have sex with any of the girls, so I can't say who he had sex with in his whole life or not, but I just know it wasn't with me when I was with other girls," Giuffre went on to say.

"I worked for Donald Trump, and I've met him probably a few times," she said further.

Giuffre said she worked at Trump's Mar-A-Lago resort and said her father spoke to Trump when Trump was at the facility.

And the House released 23,000 pages of Epstein documents, while the Dems cherry-pick THREE and they SHOW nothing. AND critics will keep insisting there is MORE when there is NO MORE, no proof of any wrong doing(s) by Trump. PERIOD. Sorry Dems.

There is NO THERE THERE.

[Dukasaur]

[jusplay4fun]

Humor. Good One, Duk.

Unfortunately for you and others with TDS, this answers NOTHING I posted. There was NO REFUTATION, getting near the level (of worthless videos) of our missing parrot with TDS.

[Dukasaur]

Humor. Good One, Duk.

Unfortunately for you and others with TDS, this answers NOTHING I posted. There was NO REFUTATION, getting near the level (of worthless videos) of our missing parrot with TDS.

There's no point debating this with you. You say there's nothing there. You can't prove a negative, so that's as far as you can go.

Any reasonable person would conclude that there has to be SOMEthing there, or the Turmp administrations wouldn't be so adamant about not showing the evidence. If there's nothing to hide, why hide it?

Dozens of very credible women have testified about Trump's sexual assaults. The fact that his multimillion-dollar legal budget has been sufficient to prevent any criminal convictions is irrelevant. People can look at the evidence and draw their own conclusion. If your hero worship doesn't permit you to look, so be it. No skin off my ass.

Knowing that Trump has many times abused his power and wealth to make (at the very least) indecent assaults on young women, and knowing that his close friend and associate Epstein (and yes, you cannot dispute that they were close friends until they had their falling-out) was a pimp and pedophile, it just seems an inescapable conclusion that Trump would (at least at some time) have taken advantage of Epstein's stable. Regardless of how well they manage to bury the evidence, that is the reasonable conclusion.