
Moderator: Clan Directors
Denise wrote:Pedro!!! As you can probably tell from the long response time to your post, we've all fallen asleep from boredom without you around to liven up our forum.
benga wrote:Denise wrote:Pedro!!! As you can probably tell from the long response time to your post, we've all fallen asleep from boredom without you around to liven up our forum.
tofu is boring??
who would have guessed
BoganGod wrote:
I think the word we are searching for is bland, not boring. Tired of baiting kort, and taking a break from you sitting duties eh benga?
BoganGod wrote:benga wrote:Denise wrote:Pedro!!! As you can probably tell from the long response time to your post, we've all fallen asleep from boredom without you around to liven up our forum.
tofu is boring??
who would have guessed
I think the word we are searching for is bland, not boring. Tired of baiting kort, and taking a break from you sitting duties eh benga?
CoF feel free to visit just maybe don't be wearing last year's mitchel johnson teashirt. You know the one "He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right. Johnson is shite"
ashes are boring again, would it be too much to ask to have some closer matches. Rather than a flogging being delivered by either side.
Chariot of Fire wrote:Aussies - young, keen and hungry and just coming of age.
England - long in the tooth, complacent and lacking spark
In truth this Ashes series came way too soon after the last (pretty ridiculous really) and Bogan's spot on when he talks about one-sided results. Credit to the Aussies though - they're the hungrier for success.
It also got me thinking....cricket is probably the sport where 'playing away' is more disadvantageous than any other. Would that be right?
"The fractured, divided and self-absorbed Australia/England team (delete according to whether you are discussing this Ashes series or the last one) have proved woefully incapable of showing the guts, fortitude and will power to match the ruthless, united and courageous team spirit of England/Australia. Sadly, England/Australia give the impression of being more interested in money, glory and fame than in putting their bodies on the line for their country. There is a clear lack of leadership from Clarke/Cook, and one senses that old wounds have not properly healed between key senior players. If this is the best XI wearing the three lions/baggy green, then one wonders about the moral collapse and decadence of a once proud old/young nation."
Chariot of Fire wrote:Aussies - young, keen and hungry and just coming of age. Carrying a bit of deadwood and old players. 36yr old wicket keeper for example, though he is playing the best he ever has played.
England - long in the tooth, complacent and lacking spark some truth in this, though I do wonder whether we would be judging them so harshly if we had not built them up so much/expected so much better based on recent form against the aussies.
In truth this Ashes series came way too soon after the last (pretty ridiculous really)couldn't agree more. The ashes now seems more of a commute, day in day out, then a rare well planned special holiday and Bogan's spot on when he talks about one-sided results. Credit to the Aussies though - they're the hungrier for success.
It also got me thinking....cricket is probably the sport where 'playing away' is more disadvantageous than any other. Would that be right? You might be onto something there. Though leehar makes some good points on the topic. I know historically there has been marked disadvantage in visiting India. A number of times the aussies and kiwis have flat out accused the Indians of arranging a nice dose of debilitating food poisoning!
leehar wrote:However, I wouldn't have expected the same with England/Aus since the tracks are pretty similar, so perhaps it's just home support and maybe some jetlag from time differences? But these are professional outfits so they should be able to manage!
BoganGod wrote:Took the time to read the article you quoted from. Very interesting, thank you for posting it mate. I enjoyed it.
I'm longing to again see a day when the windies, lanka, and pakistan were all teams to be feared. As a kid mucking around, didn't mind pretending to be playing for the windies or lanka, in particular if I was trying(abject failure) to be a fast bowler. Now suggest to an aussie or kiwi child that they pretend to be pakistani... "Get *#&$#, I'm not going to play as one of those $*#&@(# max fixing, can't bat, can't bowl scum"
betiko wrote:what does cricket mean? I thought it was a funny insect.
BoganGod wrote:betiko wrote:what does cricket mean? I thought it was a funny insect.
Sorry I was going to say something rude, then I remembered that france has banned search engines as being against the spirit of the republic. Driving tractors to paris = good. Using google = a threat to national stability.
Cricket is a game played by mad dogs and english men(the only two types of mammals that will go out into the hot sun for extended periods of time by choice).
A game like rugby, football and darts, that the english invented for other nations to beat them at.
The americans dumbed down cricket, made it less athletic, more stop start and better for advertising. Called it baseball.
betiko wrote:BoganGod wrote:betiko wrote:what does cricket mean? I thought it was a funny insect.
Sorry I was going to say something rude, then I remembered that france has banned search engines as being against the spirit of the republic. Driving tractors to paris = good. Using google = a threat to national stability.
Cricket is a game played by mad dogs and english men(the only two types of mammals that will go out into the hot sun for extended periods of time by choice).
A game like rugby, football and darts, that the english invented for other nations to beat them at.
The americans dumbed down cricket, made it less athletic, more stop start and better for advertising. Called it baseball.
i googled it and it said insect. it says it can be a plague.
betiko wrote:dude, i don't know how you americans can watch a baseball game in the first place... isn't it always over 3h???
While I tell you this I do enjoy watching a good disputed game of tennis, which can last.... a whole week with a 5th set at 69-71 lol
shaneback wrote:Baseball is only good in person or on the radio. Nothing like sitting in the afternoon sun with a cold beer, a bag of peanuts, and trying to figure out the scoreboard stumper.
I agree baseball on TV can be boring.
I have no clue what is going on in cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users