Moderator: Clan Directors
Leehar wrote:Yeah, the dataset I uploaded onto the dropbox is from a while ago, so it probably hasn't been updated since early december. Ice should have the latest version.
But you do make a good point, it is going to be very tough to reach a perfect match, so we just need to make sure we reach a close approximation of what we're looking for & remove any significant deviations.
Is there any way to match what we have in the database to the F400's dataset without a manual line-by-line analysis?
The crucial elements are the 2 clans scores, and the date?
IcePack wrote:Can I ask how you were able to become the mod for the usergroup? I don't seem to recall the mechanism for processing such a change, so would be interesting to note for future reference.
On that score, I do agree that Lx is the best man for the job now that crown is gone, so could you add him as the mod for the time-being while we brainstorm how to move the project forward?
I can't change Lindax there, but any admin can via submitting and e ticket.
As posted here & discussed with Lx over Skype, I do not wish to be the moderator over there long term.Good to know about the CL results being one of the likely elements that are screwing up the on-site scoreboard, any other ideas on what is causing major discrepancies between the 2 systems? Otherwise if it's some of these relatively minor areas since I don't think the small sample sizes can cause huge issues, we can perhaps move forward with the current scoreboard if it provides a close enough approximation of the F400. As BW mentioned above, it doesn't really make sense to hold up the useful update for smaller technicalities.
It's really difficult to know exactly what's going on with CC's side of things. I can only guess. I know I spent some time on it awhile ago and things weren't adding up, but it was difficult to pin point why / where the issues were. The last time results were compared in February there was some very odd results on the CC side, but I suppose that all depends on the definition of "close enough approximation". If I recall there was 3-4 very odd results in the top 10, so if 60-70% of the top 10 matching is close enough then I guess your ready to go. I'd have to look again and you / BW are going to have to decide how close is close enough.
Keefie wrote:BW,
Looking at that list of wars and the first thing that screams at me is that there are loads of 2014 completed wars missing.
K
Leehar wrote:Keefie wrote:BW,
Looking at that list of wars and the first thing that screams at me is that there are loads of 2014 completed wars missing.
K
Thats because it was done in early 2014?
Keefie wrote:Leehar wrote:Keefie wrote:BW,
Looking at that list of wars and the first thing that screams at me is that there are loads of 2014 completed wars missing.
K
Thats because it was done in early 2014?
OK.
I'm quite happy to help out here. Have the two sets of data been thoroughly checked ? I can do that if they haven't.
K
Keefie wrote:Leehar wrote:Keefie wrote:BW,
Looking at that list of wars and the first thing that screams at me is that there are loads of 2014 completed wars missing.
K
Thats because it was done in early 2014?
OK.
I'm quite happy to help out here. Have the two sets of data been thoroughly checked ? I can do that if they haven't.
K
Keefie wrote:BW,
Could I ask you to run your stuff again with a cut off date of 31st October. If you could post a snap of the data again I'll use that to compare against Ice's F41 for the same date.
Cheers
Keith
Keefie wrote:Would it be possible to see the full table for all clans, before you make any changes to exclude non-active clans.
Thanks
bigWham wrote:So the above score for HDN from IcePack is different again, can someone clarify?
The algorithm I used was "Algorithm of 400", which I think is different to "F41". It was sent to me in HTML/javascript format, and did what I could to convert the process.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users